Modeling Car Parking Transitions in the Gowanus BID — from data insight to community consensus.
Gowanus is a low-rise, mixed-use neighborhood in Brooklyn organized around a 1.8-mile tidal canal. For most of the 20th century, it was defined by industry — gasworks, concrete plants, and warehouses. Today, the neighborhood is undergoing a major transformation, with art studios and breweries moving into former factory spaces and new residential towers rising along the waterfront.
Even as Gowanus changes, its industrial legacy remains visible, most notably in the heavily polluted Gowanus Canal — one of the most polluted waterways in the United States, leading to its designation as a Superfund site in 2010.
Amid ongoing environmental remediation, the city approved the Gowanus Neighborhood Rezoning plan in 2021 — one of the largest in the area's recent history — introducing approximately 8,500 new units by 2035, while requiring that a portion be affordable.
A unified, inclusive waterfront that works as everyday public space, not just as the edge of new development. A canal that is clean, accessible, visible, and welcoming to old and new residents, workers, and visitors alike.
The rezoning envisions Gowanus as a more pedestrian-friendly neighborhood. A central goal is a continuous public walkway along the canal — converting stretches of car-dominated street frontage into green, accessible waterfront space.
NYC Department of City Planning — Gowanus waterfront access plan
Gowanus is not one public. The BID brings together communities with different resources, expectations, and relationships to the street. Because public space maintenance is its largest expense, the waterfront cannot serve new development alone — it must become a shared civic space that every group feels belongs to them.
Professionals and higher-income households moving into luxury waterfront and 4th Ave buildings, expecting a clean, green waterfront for leisure and recreation.
Gowanus Houses in the NW corner — first time ever a NYC BID includes social housing in its boundaries. Residents gain access to BID services (sanitation, beautification).
Existing residents and local businesses with long-standing ties, navigating construction disruption and parking frustration daily.
Remaining industrial users and artists, some living in studios unofficially to stay in the area.
Based on the Gowanus rezoning environmental report (NYC FEIS), curbside parking demand is rising while supply remains constrained. Gowanus already has just over 2,000 on-street spaces, with midday occupancy around 90%, and FEIS projections show only about 1,940 on-street spaces by 2035 as growth continues. That leaves very limited buffer in the street system, increasing the risk of overflow without a clear absorption strategy for new demand.
Historical NYC data proves that without proactive curb management, residential booms break local infrastructure. Here is how Gowanus compares to precedent.
The strategy is to reallocate parking, not remove it outright — converting the least disruptive canal-edge curb space and shifting displaced vehicles into centralized garages so overall supply stays demand-neutral.
Do not solve parking in a way that induces more driving or car ownership. The goal is better management, not more capacity.
Reduce harmful curb occupation near the water. Streets crossing the canal should prioritize pedestrian access, turning dead-ends into shared public amenities.
Start with coordination, pricing, and access to underused off-street supply before pursuing new construction.
Each scenario was built in GAMA — an agent-based simulation platform — using real Gowanus road networks and parking data. Every dot is a car. Every cycle is 10 seconds of simulated time.
The current state. 300 sampled street spots running at 90% initial occupancy. Demand is balanced — cars arrive, park, dwell, and leave at roughly equal rates. The streets are full but functional.
The first wave of rezoning units arrives. Demand increases 30%. Streets push toward 97% occupancy. The overflow chart starts climbing — cars circling the BID unable to find a spot. Purple dots multiply.
Four structured garages open across the BID. Residents are routed to garages first; visitors keep the street spots. Street occupancy drops to 65%. Gold garage circles appear — residents are absorbing into the new system.
All 8,000 rezoning units occupied. Streets pushed to 99% occupancy. The overflow chart rises steeply — a high and growing stream of cars leaving the BID without parking. Watch the purple dots accumulate.
Street parking eliminated. Seven garages operate across the BID. All vehicles must use structured parking. Overflow drops to near zero. The freed curb becomes space for people: wider sidewalks, trees, outdoor seating.
Cars that can't find parking in the BID don't disappear — they spill outward into surrounding neighborhoods, turning a Gowanus problem into a Carroll Gardens, Park Slope, and Red Hook problem.
By 2034, an estimated 80–120 cars per hour are displaced from the BID during peak times. They cruise into Carroll Gardens, Park Slope, and Red Hook — streets not designed to absorb that demand. Residents of neighboring blocks lose parking they've relied on for decades.
The 2034 garage-only scenario reduces overflow to near zero. Cars that can't find a garage space leave the area entirely rather than circling neighboring streets. The pressure radius collapses from 500m+ to under 50m — contained within the BID itself.
Simulation outputs across all five scenarios — comparing occupancy, overflow, and where residents actually end up parking over time.
A BID-operated resident permit model turns parking from a burden into a self-sustaining revenue engine for the neighborhood.
Permit fees and visitor rates pool into a BID fund — then flow back into the streets that generated them.
The design process only works if it is transparent and inclusive. Here is how we package each phase of this work for the people it affects.
Click a mapped parking spot to mark what should be protected, removed, or kept neutral, then leave a block-level comment.
Use the map to test tradeoffs publicly. Every vote becomes a prompt for the real conversation: what changes, who is affected, and what needs to be protected?
Different stakeholders need different evidence before a parking transition feels workable.
Higher fidelity visuals help stakeholders react to concrete conditions instead of abstract policy language. Better visuals lead to better and more specific feedback.
What happens if the garage moves to another corner of the BID? Will foot traffic shift away from my business? How far will I need to walk?
Visible resident and business input gives agencies and garage partners a clearer mandate for permits, siting decisions, and public realm tradeoffs.
The same simulation can work on phones, workshop screens, and community board materials.
Residents can vote on specific spots, react to tradeoffs, and leave comments in a fast, accessible format.
Shared digital surfaces let neighbors, businesses, and planners test scenarios together in real time.
Formal meetings are stronger when people arrive with concrete visuals, documented feedback, and clearer areas of agreement.
No comments yet.